air dog fuel system
|
|
Traxxas RTR 1/10 Monster Revo 3.3 4WD Monster Truck 2.4GHz $1,029.99 The pinnacle of monster truck performance, Revo s advanced design is an engineering marvel that turned the world of R/C upside down with its completely unique chassis and suspension configuration. Today s Revo 3.3 combines legendary performance with incredible all-terrain ability and a wider, tougher stance for maximum monster fun. The heavy-duty reversing transmission lets Revo 3.3 back out of ti… |
|
|
WWII: Battle over the Pacific Overview: The time: World War II, the place: the skies over the Pacific Ocean and you are the only pilot who has what it takes to stand a chance against the enemy forces. You’ll need your wits about you to gun down bomber and fighter planes as well as battleships and to eliminate fuel tanks, storage buildings and much more. The risks are high but the glory even greater for those brave enough to ta… |
|
|
Spectre Performance 9900 Air Intake Kit with Red hpR Filter for GM Truck $138.95 For maximum airflow, maximum throttle response and maximum fuel economy, you need the best air intake system available–Spectre. This custom-designed system features a larger filter area and larger tubing, so your engine will get the air it needs. It’s easy to install with basic hand tools and the red filter and polished aluminum casing look great on your engine. You’ll see the difference every ti… |
|
|
AirDog FP-150 1998.5-2004 Dodge Cummins $589.99 … |
|
|
Air Dog Original 150GPH Fuel Pump – 1998.5-2004 Dodge 5.9L Cummins $529.00 The AirDog 150 GPH provides the most effective technology designed specifically for diesel pickups to remove water, particulates, vapor and entrained air from diesel fuel. The AirDog replaces the Cummins factory lift pump and filter system, and enhances the fuel delivery to the Powerstroke and Duramax with a commercial duty system…. |
Global warming? Not from CO2 from burning on the surface of the Earth. CO2 heavier than air?
Certain lakes in Africa reported to belch CO2 from rotting veg in the lake bottom. Sudden release, the CO2 drifts down the lowest valley out of the lake, everything dead down wind. Cows, dogs, people, birds. The CO2 is rapidly taken up by growing plants and cleared from the air. Big mystery until solved by investigations.
Stage and movies productions, low mystery fog, produced by dry ice= CO2. Heavier than air.
Surface growing plants, land and sea, take up CO2 instantly when in contact. CO2 is basic plant food. 85% of Earth covered by oceans. Land plants minor users of CO2 in comparison to the sea plants and buffer systems.
CO2 atomic wt. -44. O2 -32. N -28. H2O -18. Clouds(water vapor) on a hot day can only get up to the mid 20,000 ft.
Fuel burned above 30,000 ft (jet fuel) main way CO2 gets into the upper atmosphere in large quantities. 2-5 tons per hr per engine. 3.66 tons of CO2 /ton of fuel burned. Settles down slowly.
And your question is?
===================
“CapNemo” likes to go to all the global warming questions and paste in a statement pooh-poohing the threat. His statement is misleading and incorrect.
He says it’s only increased by 1 degree (F) in 125 years. This is a misleading number, because it is a global average: land and sea. We don’t live in the middle of the ocean and that’s not where the polar ice caps are melting. The temperature change over land surfaces has been twice that, and most of it in the last 40 years.
He says, “The average temperature in Antarctica is 109 degrees below zero.” If you go to his source, it says, “Temperatures reach a minimum of between -80 °C and -90 °C (-112 °F and -130 °F) in the interior in winter and reach a maximum of between +5 °C and +15 °C (41 °F and 59 °F) near the coast in summer.” OK, now the observation that the caps are melting makes more sense. It melts at the coast, in the summer, DUH! (Note by the way that his average number (-109) is only 3 degrees lower than one of the minimum numbers. I wonder, what kind of math did he learn?)
Then he says, “Back in the ’70s all the hype was about global COOLING”. All what hype? I was around then. I don’t remember any hype. And if you go to his source, it says, “This theory gained temporary popular attention due to press reporting … The theory never had strong scientific support”. He tries to mislead us, by implying that a temporary flurry pf press reporting is comparable to what we are seeing now and that some hype without scientific basis is somehow similar to a consensus within the scientific community about global warming.
The truth is that those 2 degrees are HUGE in the scale of average weather change. But the real problem is the speed of change and that it’s accelerating. Scientists are predicting a temp 4 to 8 degree (F) increase over the next 75 years. “This may not sound like a great deal, but just a fraction of a degree can have huge implications on the climate, with very noticeable consequences.” (http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/U/ukweather2080/5_predicting.html ). Yes, scientists predict, that’s their job. They’ve gone to school years more than we have and spent their lives studying this stuff. This representrs humanity’s BEST GUESS at where this is all going. Of course, you can believe it snows in hell, or any other stupid thing you want. No one can stop you from believing what you’d rather hear, than what is the most probable outcome.
The link between CO2 and global warming is undisputed at this time. The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by more than 50% over the last 115 years (250 to 381 ppm, http://awesomenature.tribe.net/thread/fcc70c8b-be7e-489b-85f7-6c6c08031c65 ). In the last 30 years, it increased at a rate 30 times faster than at any period during the last 800,000 years. In other words, this change is totally unprecedented. (http://awesomenature.tribe.net/thread/fcc70c8b-be7e-489b-85f7-6c6c08031c65 ). What else is totally unprecedented about the last 115 years? Industrialization and the population explosion. Duh. This is not rocket science; it is simple arithmetic!
“If Bert Drake is right, the good news is that, within the foreseeable future, Maine residents will be able to stop banking their foundations and to store their down parkas and snow blowers in the barn permanently. The bad news is that a lot of those barns will be underwater” (http://awesomenature.tribe.net/thread/fcc70c8b-be7e-489b-85f7-6c6c08031c65 ). Yes, this is opinion. Who is Bert Drake? He’s an SERC researcher who’s been studying this for 17 years. If we aren’t going to believe our scientists, who then shall we believe??? Oh, I know. Let’s believe CapNemo!!!
If global warming wasn’t a real threat, why have 178 nations ratified the Kyoto Protocol to limit CO2 emissions? Why are the US and Australia the only two holdouts among the industrialized nations? (http://environment.about.com/od/kyotoprotocol/i/kyotoprotocol_2.htm )
CapNemo’s statement reminds me about the frog in the pot on the stove that doesn’t move as the water gradually gets hotter and hotter. From this seemingly insignificant 2 degree change, we’ve already seen enormous consequences. (http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/Impacts/) How much hotter does it have to get for some people to wake up and face the music? And in the meantime, while you’re pondering all of this, be sure to check the dates on people’s references. Things are changing so rapidly that older information is no longer useful.
Average Northern Hemisphere Temperatures for last 1000 years:
AirDog Installation – Video 1 of 2
